Landscaping internal migrant vulnerabilities and labor department schemes
IndiaInternal MigrationSocial Protection
I led a research project in collaboration with the research team at Jan Sahas’s Migrants Resilience Collaborative. In this project, I built a database of different labor department welfare schemes in India. Next, I constructed a unique vulnerability index using a weighting technique to rank schemes based on vulnerabilities migrants experience tied to their demographic profiles. Finally, I designed an application in which users can enter different demographic profiles of migrants and see a ranking of types of schemes that may be most important to that migrant persona. This research contributes to the literature on optimal program design with respect to welfare targeting and lays the foundation for future research into interventions that can increase internal migrants’ take-up of specific schemes.
Governments in developing countries often offer a variety of social protection programs to their citizens, but take-up rates remain quite low. While researchers have studied interventions meant to improve the take-up and targeting of specific welfare schemes, little is known about how individuals navigate the entire system of welfare schemes and decide which ones to apply to. Exposure to a large quantity of welfare benefits can have countervailing effects. On the one hand, when individuals have many welfare schemes to choose from, they can make a targeted choice in applying to the benefit(s) that fit their needs the most. On the other hand, they might be overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of schemes they could apply to and not apply to any, leading them to miss out on key benefits. Therefore, studying how individuals make decisions on how many and which welfare schemes to apply to can shed light on the role that behavioral elements of choice play in a social protection setting. I will implement a randomized controlled trial that varies the number of benefits frontline workers share with informal workers in India, a country with thousands of welfare schemes. I conducted a similar pilot study with over 2,000 workers in New Delhi and found that on average, individuals went on to apply to 1 scheme upon learning about their eligibility. People who learned about one-scheme applied to 0.203 more schemes than did people who learned about multiple-schemes, translating to 498 more schemes availed. I will refine and scale this study to gather more evidence on "scheme overload" and investigate its welfare effects by analyzing how the quantity of schemes shared impacts the quantity and match-quality of schemes availed. My research highlights the importance of studying take-up in multi-scheme settings and motivates policies related to scheme convergence.